Please note: We are currently experiencing some performance issues across the site, and some pages may be slow to load. We are working on restoring normal service soon. Importing new articles from Word documents is also currently unavailable. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Hiro Ishii

and 5 more

Objectives: To investigate how surgeons interpret the ATA 2015 and BTA 2014 guidelines for low risk well differentiated thyroid cancers (LRDTCs) and how they impact patient experiences across the UK. Design: Three nationally disseminated anonymised questionnaires. Setting: A nationwide snapshot of LRDTC management. Participants: Thyroid surgeons and their respective thyroid cancer multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) and thyroid cancer patients. Main outcome measures: The outcomes of interest were how surgeons/MDTs are managing LRDTCs and patient perspectives on ‘shared-decision-making’ and their ideal surgical management for LRDTCs. Results: 74 surgeons responded. 88% utilised BTA guidelines to assess recurrence risk. Tumour size, histology, stage T3b and central nodal involvement were important for >85%, but age (>45 years) only for 50%. In T1 (2cm), Thy5 solitary nodule, 58% supported hemi-thyroidectomy (HT), with 33% for total thyroidectomy (TT). In T2 (3cm) PTC, 54% opted for TT, with 24% favouring HT. Over 90% recommended TT for any incidentally excised microscopically positive lymph nodes. In T1a(m) multifocal micro-PTC, 63% suggested HT, but with contralateral benign nodules, 66% supported TT. 40% of patients felt ‘pros and cons’ of different managements were not fully explained. 47% felt they didn’t have significant input in their management, with 53% feeling final management was clinician’s choice. 60% preferred TT, with 80% wanting to ensure there was no cancer left and avoid recurrence. 20% preferred HT, with 46% wishing to avoid lifelong thyroxine. Conclusions: There is variation in risk assessment and management of LRDTCs nationally, with contrasting views of optimum treatment between patients and clinicians. These variations in practice are affecting patient experiences nationally.