loading page

How do trematode clones differ by fitness-related traits and interact within the host?
  • +3
  • Ekaterina Mironova,
  • Sergei Spiridonov,
  • Danila Sotnikov,
  • Anastasiya Shpagina,
  • Kseniia Savina,
  • Mikhail Gopko
Ekaterina Mironova
A N Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Sergei Spiridonov
A N Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author Profile
Danila Sotnikov
Russian State Agrarian University Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Author Profile
Anastasiya Shpagina
Russian State Agrarian University Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Author Profile
Kseniia Savina
A N Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author Profile
Mikhail Gopko
A N Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author Profile

Abstract

Polyclonal infections are widespread and provide evidence of facilitation, competition, and neutral interactions between parasite clones, even within the same host-parasite system. The outcome of co-infections is usually assessed by parasite infection intensities, while other important fitness-related traits, e.g. larval growth rates, are often ignored. We studied both infectivity and the growth rate of different clones of the common trematode Diplostomum pseudospathaceum in the fish host (Salvelinus malma) and tested how these fitness-related traits changed in double-clone infections compared to single-clone ones. We found that the growth rates of the parasite’s clones were more variable than their infectivity. The relationships of these D. pseudospathaceum traits with host mass were clone-specific. Some clones demonstrated higher infection intensities and growth rates in larger fish. It hints that specialization on different size groups of hosts may occur in this parasite species. In addition, we found positive density-dependent growth (Allee effect), rarely reported for parasites. Interestingly, it was observed only in mixed infections and we discuss the reasons for it. In double-clone infections, both evidence of facilitation and competition between D. pseudospathaceum clones were found. The outcome of co-infections varied not only between genotype combinations but also between tested traits. Clones either ‘cooperated’ when infecting the host or competed when growing. There were no clone pairs, in which interactions changed their type with time or were observed constantly during parasite development.