Comparison when individual heart level corrections were used |
Comparison when individual heart level corrections were used |
Comparison when individual heart level corrections were used |
Comparison when individual heart level corrections were used |
Comparison when individual heart level corrections were
used |
|
Mean 1 |
Mean 2 |
Mean difference (95% CI)†
|
Adjusted p value |
NIBP vs. MT |
55 |
58 |
-3 (-4, -1) |
0.0006 |
NIBP vs. FA* |
56 |
57 |
-1 (-3, 1) |
0.3* |
NIBP vs. TFA |
56 |
60 |
-4 (-6, -2) |
<0.0001 |
Comparison when standard heart level correction of 27 mmHg was
used |
Comparison when standard heart level correction of 27
mmHg was used |
Comparison when standard heart level correction
of 27 mmHg was used |
Comparison when standard heart level
correction of 27 mmHg was used |
Comparison when standard heart
level correction of 27 mmHg was used |
|
Mean 1 |
Mean 2 |
Mean difference (95% CI)†
|
Adjusted p value |
NIBP vs. MT* |
58 |
58 |
0 (-2, 1) |
>
0.9999* |
NIBP vs. FA* |
58 |
57 |
1 (-1, 3) |
0.4* |
NIBP vs. TFA |
58 |
60 |
-2 (-4, 0) |
0.02 |