Comparison when individual heart level corrections were used Comparison when individual heart level corrections were used Comparison when individual heart level corrections were used Comparison when individual heart level corrections were used Comparison when individual heart level corrections were used
Mean 1 Mean 2 Mean difference (95% CI) Adjusted p value
NIBP vs. MT 55 58 -3 (-4, -1) 0.0006
NIBP vs. FA* 56 57 -1 (-3, 1) 0.3*
NIBP vs. TFA 56 60 -4 (-6, -2) <0.0001
Comparison when standard heart level correction of 27 mmHg was used Comparison when standard heart level correction of 27 mmHg was used Comparison when standard heart level correction of 27 mmHg was used Comparison when standard heart level correction of 27 mmHg was used Comparison when standard heart level correction of 27 mmHg was used
Mean 1 Mean 2 Mean difference (95% CI) Adjusted p value
NIBP vs. MT* 58 58 0 (-2, 1) > 0.9999*
NIBP vs. FA* 58 57 1 (-1, 3) 0.4*
NIBP vs. TFA 58 60 -2 (-4, 0) 0.02