17IP-10-8A
(USU-2694)
|
4.18 ± 1.39
|
2.33 ± 0.74 [MAM]
|
58.397160,
-137.089075
|
57 m,
5/31/17
|
Dune crest on highest part of Terrace B, sample depth = 105 cm.
Unconsolidated laminated medium-to-fine-grained sand.
|
Dune crest on highest part of Terrace B, sample depth = 105 cm.
Unconsolidated laminated medium-to-fine-grained sand.
|
Dune crest on highest part of Terrace B, sample depth = 105 cm.
Unconsolidated laminated medium-to-fine-grained sand.
|
17IP-10-7A,
(USU-2693)
|
4.74 ± 1.10
|
3.22 ± 0.68 [CAM]
|
58.397160,
-137.089075
|
57 m,
5/31/17
|
Dune crest overlying the highest part of Terrace B, sample depth = 142
cm. Unconsolidated laminated medium-to-fine-grained sand.
|
Dune crest overlying the highest part of Terrace B, sample depth = 142
cm. Unconsolidated laminated medium-to-fine-grained sand.
|
Dune crest overlying the highest part of Terrace B, sample depth = 142
cm. Unconsolidated laminated medium-to-fine-grained sand.
|
17IP-28-2A,
(USU-2696)
|
4.39 ± 0.66
|
4.16 ± 0.51 [CAM]
|
58.400163,
-137.080493
|
35 m,
6/6/17
|
Tocher’s Gulch, sample depth = 270 cm below shoreline B8 of Terrace B,
beach sand with heavy mineral laminations.
|
Tocher’s Gulch, sample depth = 270 cm below shoreline B8 of Terrace B,
beach sand with heavy mineral laminations.
|
Tocher’s Gulch, sample depth = 270 cm below shoreline B8 of Terrace B,
beach sand with heavy mineral laminations.
|
17IP-28-1A,
(USU-2695)
|
5.99 ± 1.02
|
4.01 ± 0.58 [MAM]
|
58.400163,
-137.080493
|
35 m,
6/6/17
|
Tocher’s Gulch, sample depth = 389 cm below shoreline B8 of Terrace B,
beach sand with heavy mineral laminations, cobbles (few).
|
Tocher’s Gulch, sample depth = 389 cm below shoreline B8 of Terrace B,
beach sand with heavy mineral laminations, cobbles (few).
|
Tocher’s Gulch, sample depth = 389 cm below shoreline B8 of Terrace B,
beach sand with heavy mineral laminations, cobbles (few).
|
17IP-30-1A,
(USU-2697)
|
5.98 ± 1.71
|
4.28 ± 1.16 [MAM]
|
58.406014,
-137.084810
|
20 m,
5/30/17; 6/6/17
|
Trident Channel (Fig. 5), sample depth = 134 cm,
laminated-to-cross-laminated fluvial/beach sand and gravel.
|
Trident Channel (Fig. 5), sample depth = 134 cm,
laminated-to-cross-laminated fluvial/beach sand and gravel.
|
Trident Channel (Fig. 5), sample depth = 134 cm,
laminated-to-cross-laminated fluvial/beach sand and gravel.
|
*Analyses performed by Utah State University (USU) Luminescence
Laboratory. Age analysis using the single-aliquot regenerative-dose
procedure of Wallinga et al. (2000) on 2mm small-aliquots of feldspar
sand at 50°C IRSL. Number of aliquots used in age calculation and number
of aliquots analyzed in parentheses.
§IRSL age on each aliquot corrected for fading
following the method by Auclair et al. (2003) and correction model of
Huntley and Lamothe (2001).
†Equivalent dose (DE) and IRSL age calculated using the Central Age
Model (CAM) or Minimum Age Model (MAM) of Galbraith and Roberts (2012).
#Latitude, decimal degrees north; longitude, decimal degrees
west.
|
*Analyses performed by Utah State University (USU) Luminescence
Laboratory. Age analysis using the single-aliquot regenerative-dose
procedure of Wallinga et al. (2000) on 2mm small-aliquots of feldspar
sand at 50°C IRSL. Number of aliquots used in age calculation and number
of aliquots analyzed in parentheses.
§IRSL age on each aliquot corrected for fading
following the method by Auclair et al. (2003) and correction model of
Huntley and Lamothe (2001).
†Equivalent dose (DE) and IRSL age calculated using the Central Age
Model (CAM) or Minimum Age Model (MAM) of Galbraith and Roberts (2012).
#Latitude, decimal degrees north; longitude, decimal degrees
west.
|
*Analyses performed by Utah State University (USU) Luminescence
Laboratory. Age analysis using the single-aliquot regenerative-dose
procedure of Wallinga et al. (2000) on 2mm small-aliquots of feldspar
sand at 50°C IRSL. Number of aliquots used in age calculation and number
of aliquots analyzed in parentheses.
§IRSL age on each aliquot corrected for fading
following the method by Auclair et al. (2003) and correction model of
Huntley and Lamothe (2001).
†Equivalent dose (DE) and IRSL age calculated using the Central Age
Model (CAM) or Minimum Age Model (MAM) of Galbraith and Roberts (2012).
#Latitude, decimal degrees north; longitude, decimal degrees
west.
|
*Analyses performed by Utah State University (USU) Luminescence
Laboratory. Age analysis using the single-aliquot regenerative-dose
procedure of Wallinga et al. (2000) on 2mm small-aliquots of feldspar
sand at 50°C IRSL. Number of aliquots used in age calculation and number
of aliquots analyzed in parentheses.
§IRSL age on each aliquot corrected for fading
following the method by Auclair et al. (2003) and correction model of
Huntley and Lamothe (2001).
†Equivalent dose (DE) and IRSL age calculated using the Central Age
Model (CAM) or Minimum Age Model (MAM) of Galbraith and Roberts (2012).
#Latitude, decimal degrees north; longitude, decimal degrees
west.
|
*Analyses performed by Utah State University (USU) Luminescence
Laboratory. Age analysis using the single-aliquot regenerative-dose
procedure of Wallinga et al. (2000) on 2mm small-aliquots of feldspar
sand at 50°C IRSL. Number of aliquots used in age calculation and number
of aliquots analyzed in parentheses.
§IRSL age on each aliquot corrected for fading
following the method by Auclair et al. (2003) and correction model of
Huntley and Lamothe (2001).
†Equivalent dose (DE) and IRSL age calculated using the Central Age
Model (CAM) or Minimum Age Model (MAM) of Galbraith and Roberts (2012).
#Latitude, decimal degrees north; longitude, decimal degrees
west.
|
*Analyses performed by Utah State University (USU) Luminescence
Laboratory. Age analysis using the single-aliquot regenerative-dose
procedure of Wallinga et al. (2000) on 2mm small-aliquots of feldspar
sand at 50°C IRSL. Number of aliquots used in age calculation and number
of aliquots analyzed in parentheses.
§IRSL age on each aliquot corrected for fading
following the method by Auclair et al. (2003) and correction model of
Huntley and Lamothe (2001).
†Equivalent dose (DE) and IRSL age calculated using the Central Age
Model (CAM) or Minimum Age Model (MAM) of Galbraith and Roberts (2012).
#Latitude, decimal degrees north; longitude, decimal degrees
west.
|
*Analyses performed by Utah State University (USU) Luminescence
Laboratory. Age analysis using the single-aliquot regenerative-dose
procedure of Wallinga et al. (2000) on 2mm small-aliquots of feldspar
sand at 50°C IRSL. Number of aliquots used in age calculation and number
of aliquots analyzed in parentheses.
§IRSL age on each aliquot corrected for fading
following the method by Auclair et al. (2003) and correction model of
Huntley and Lamothe (2001).
†Equivalent dose (DE) and IRSL age calculated using the Central Age
Model (CAM) or Minimum Age Model (MAM) of Galbraith and Roberts (2012).
#Latitude, decimal degrees north; longitude, decimal degrees
west.
|
*Analyses performed by Utah State University (USU) Luminescence
Laboratory. Age analysis using the single-aliquot regenerative-dose
procedure of Wallinga et al. (2000) on 2mm small-aliquots of feldspar
sand at 50°C IRSL. Number of aliquots used in age calculation and number
of aliquots analyzed in parentheses.
§IRSL age on each aliquot corrected for fading
following the method by Auclair et al. (2003) and correction model of
Huntley and Lamothe (2001).
†Equivalent dose (DE) and IRSL age calculated using the Central Age
Model (CAM) or Minimum Age Model (MAM) of Galbraith and Roberts (2012).
#Latitude, decimal degrees north; longitude, decimal degrees
west.
|