Discussion
Calcium channel blockers and statins have been rarely associated with leukocytoclastic vasculitis, with only a few case reports in the literature.2-6 Of calcium channel blockers, only diltiazem,3 lercarnidipine,4 and amlodipine5 have been implicated. We present a case of leukocytoclastic vasculitis associated with atorvastatin and verapamil. Using the Naranjo scale,7 this case scored five points, making it a probable association. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first formal report of leukocytoclastic vasculitis associated with verapamil, and only the second report associated with atorvastatin.2
Given both medications were started and ceased simultaneously, it is unclear whether the inciting agent was verapamil, atorvastatin, or the combination. It is well recognised that verapamil and atorvastatin interact via CYP3A4 enzyme and P-glycoprotein inhibition.8 In this case, use of this combination may have increased the concentration of either drug to supratherapeutic levels and therefore increased the risk of inducing leukocytoclastic vasculitis – assuming a dose-dependent mechanism.
We postulate that the leukocytoclastic vasculitis resulted from a type III hypersensitivity reaction ­– where drug-induced aberrant antibody production leads to immune complex formation and deposition in small vessels causing vasculitis – thought to be the general mechanism in drug-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis.9 This is supported by positive IgM and complement staining on immunofluorescence, skin-limited disease, and rash onset within the typical window of seven to ten days after commencing medications.1
However, the patient also had typical features of mixed cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis – the purpuric rash with leukocytoclastic vasculitis, C4 hypocomplementaemia, elevated RF and type II cryoglobulinaemia with polyclonal and monoclonal IgM components – which would also account for positive IgM and C3 staining on immunofluorescence studies. Cryoglobulinaemia is most likely secondary to Sjogren’s syndrome given the recognised association.10 Given the temporal relationship between initiation of the medications and development of leukocytoclastic vasculitis, a second postulated mechanism is drug-induced augmentation of cryoglobulinaemia – leading to an immune complex-mediated flare of cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis.10 To the best of our knowledge, this would be the first reported case of a cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis flare associated with atorvastatin and verapamil.
It is possible that both mechanisms contributed in this case. Given the vasculitis was skin-limited, we favour the former hypersensitivity reaction as the predominant mechanism over a drug-induced flare of cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis ­– as this typically exhibits joint, renal and neurological manifestations,10 which were absent in this patient.
Future research into molecular mechanisms would be beneficial to better understand the properties of certain medications which mediate autoimmunity and clarify genetic susceptibility to drug-induced vasculitis.9
In summary, we present a case of biopsy-proven leukocytoclastic vasculitis associated with verapamil and atorvastatin. We postulate the mechanism to be a type III hypersensitivity reaction or a drug-induced flare of cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis secondary to Sjogren’s syndrome. This case report highlights the need to carefully consider drug interactions and monitor for rare adverse effects after initiating the relatively commonly prescribed medications of atorvastatin and verapamil – particularly in patients with autoimmune disease.