In the table, R is the reduction in viral load, C is an
average of TCID50 of the positive control groups, andT is the TCID50 values of the test groups. The
residence time of the air was 1.44 seconds at the air flow rate of 0.6
m3/h in the heater with a cross-section area of 4x4
cm2 and length of 15 cm. During this time, the air
temperature increased from 20 oC to 150oC or 220 oC.
An analytical model based on the rate law for a first-order reaction and
the Arrhenius equation was used to determine the temperature dependence
of the rate constant and estimate the time required to inactivate
SARS-CoV-2(Hessling et al., 2020; Yap et al., 2020) . The rate constantk (T ) for thermal inactivation of both SARS-CoV-2 and
SARS-CoV was obtained(Hessling et al., 2020). Using the same data, we
calculated the inactivation time 0.320 s for 3 log10reductions at 150 oC and 0.007 s for 5
log10 reductions at 220 oC in the
viral load. The residence time of the virus in the heater is 4.5 times
and 205 times longer than the calculated time needed to inactivate the
virus at the temperature of 150 oC and 220oC. The approach of using the heater outlet
temperature as a reference is reasonable since the estimated times for
inactivation of the viruses are a fraction of a second and much smaller
the residence time for the selected temperatures.
4 | CONCLUSION
Our results show that high-temperature is very effective in inactivating
aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 within a second. It can be implemented primarily
during winter, just by increasing the heater’s temperature to 150oC or above for a fraction of a second to provide 3
log10 reductions in the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in air.
It has the potential to be used in houses, hospitals, shopping centers,
HVAC (heating, ventilating, and air conditioning) systems, and public
transport vehicles during winter.