TABLE 3 Pairwise comparisons of Fst estimates (above
diagonal) and deduced Nm values (below diagonal) between
populations of P. heterotricha based on nrITS and cpDNA
separately. Fst values presenting significant differentiation are
in bold, “-” indicates estimate unavailable due to the absence of
polymorphism within the corresponding populations. |
TABLE 3
Pairwise comparisons of Fst estimates (above diagonal) and
deduced Nm values (below diagonal) between populations of
P. heterotricha based on nrITS and cpDNA separately. Fst
values presenting significant differentiation are in bold, “-”
indicates estimate unavailable due to the absence of polymorphism within
the corresponding populations. |
TABLE 3 Pairwise comparisons
of Fst estimates (above diagonal) and deduced Nm values
(below diagonal) between populations of P. heterotricha based on
nrITS and cpDNA separately. Fst values presenting significant
differentiation are in bold, “-” indicates estimate unavailable due to
the absence of polymorphism within the corresponding populations. |
TABLE 3 Pairwise comparisons of Fst estimates (above
diagonal) and deduced Nm values (below diagonal) between
populations of P. heterotricha based on nrITS and cpDNA
separately. Fst values presenting significant differentiation are
in bold, “-” indicates estimate unavailable due to the absence of
polymorphism within the corresponding populations. |
TABLE 3
Pairwise comparisons of Fst estimates (above diagonal) and
deduced Nm values (below diagonal) between populations of
P. heterotricha based on nrITS and cpDNA separately. Fst
values presenting significant differentiation are in bold, “-”
indicates estimate unavailable due to the absence of polymorphism within
the corresponding populations. |
TABLE 3 Pairwise comparisons
of Fst estimates (above diagonal) and deduced Nm values
(below diagonal) between populations of P. heterotricha based on
nrITS and cpDNA separately. Fst values presenting significant
differentiation are in bold, “-” indicates estimate unavailable due to
the absence of polymorphism within the corresponding populations. |
TABLE 3 Pairwise comparisons of Fst estimates (above
diagonal) and deduced Nm values (below diagonal) between
populations of P. heterotricha based on nrITS and cpDNA
separately. Fst values presenting significant differentiation are
in bold, “-” indicates estimate unavailable due to the absence of
polymorphism within the corresponding populations. |
TABLE 3
Pairwise comparisons of Fst estimates (above diagonal) and
deduced Nm values (below diagonal) between populations of
P. heterotricha based on nrITS and cpDNA separately. Fst
values presenting significant differentiation are in bold, “-”
indicates estimate unavailable due to the absence of polymorphism within
the corresponding populations. |
TABLE 3 Pairwise comparisons
of Fst estimates (above diagonal) and deduced Nm values
(below diagonal) between populations of P. heterotricha based on
nrITS and cpDNA separately. Fst values presenting significant
differentiation are in bold, “-” indicates estimate unavailable due to
the absence of polymorphism within the corresponding populations. |
TABLE 3 Pairwise comparisons of Fst estimates (above
diagonal) and deduced Nm values (below diagonal) between
populations of P. heterotricha based on nrITS and cpDNA
separately. Fst values presenting significant differentiation are
in bold, “-” indicates estimate unavailable due to the absence of
polymorphism within the corresponding populations. |
TABLE 3
Pairwise comparisons of Fst estimates (above diagonal) and
deduced Nm values (below diagonal) between populations of
P. heterotricha based on nrITS and cpDNA separately. Fst
values presenting significant differentiation are in bold, “-”
indicates estimate unavailable due to the absence of polymorphism within
the corresponding populations. |