The article on "The HPC Certification Forum" describes the goals and objectives behind a community effort to build a testing and certification system for HPC (high-performance computing) skills.  As the profession of  Research Facilitation grows, there is a clear benefit to having a common testing and certification framework to help define the technical skills needed in the profession. The article motivates the need for this system and encourages further reading in two referenced articles.  Some noticeable aspects of the approach laid out in the article include:
Although a good overview, a lack of details in the article makes it difficult for the reader to know exactly what is intended.  For example, when reading the article I found myself asking these general question:
As this article is an introduction to the project and lacks a lot of details, leaving the reader with a lot of questions could be both good and bad.    I think part of the goal of the article is to pique the reader's interest and provide just enough information to consider going out and learning more.  However,  lack of details may leave the reader frustrated.  
The following are some suggestions to improve the article: