loading page

A cross-sectional comparison of perceived stress and emotional affect between adults with and without emotional disturbances using a novel coping strategy.
  • Dr. Scott McDoniel
Dr. Scott McDoniel
Grand Canyon University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Perceived stress has increased due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, those with diagnosed emotional disturbances note higher perceived stress ratings than those without these conditions. Emotion-focused coping can be a practical adjunctive component with problem-based solutions during elevated stress. However, it is unknown if there are differences in perceived stress levels and emotional affect in adults with and without emotional disturbances using a novel emotion-focused coping strategy. A cross-sectional study of 97 adults using the novel strategy completed an online survey of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Group one (NEDG) included 34 individuals without a history of emotional disturbance. Group two (EDG) included 63 individuals reporting an emotional disturbance (Anxiety; N= 58 & Depression; N=5). There was no significant difference in perceived stress between the NEDG (17.6 + 5.3) and EDG (17.0 + 5.5) groups. Moreover, there were no significant differences in PANAS between groups. Positive affect was in the 51st percentile (95 % CI: 45.7-56.6%), and negative affect was in the 74th percentile (95% CI: 70.4-78.9%) of normative data. Individuals with or without emotional disturbance may experience similar perceived stress levels and emotional affect while using a novel coping strategy. Additional research investigating this novel strategy is warranted.